![]() ![]() ![]() I'll hold my hands up I was wrong about roster sizes years ago when I started in club (for olders anyway). If someone tries out and they are not at the required standard for your team, don't add them and smile about the $'s.point them in the direction of another team that is likely a better fit. Yes, I know it's $'s when you add a player but as a coach it causes you playing time headaches and from a players' perspective, it's simply unfair. If a kid is not strong enough to play for a team, don't add them. If the coach believes the players are behind and he would not like to give them playing time, do not add them in the roster at the first place.Ĭlick to expand.and right there that's it. It is common for high competitive environment." But they are not in "pay to play". ![]() Many people says "Look at pro or college. I think the club should manage the roster size for everyone to play reasonable minutes even in the older age group. I don't blame good players with financial aid playing longer time, but I think full paid players should play reasonable minutes at the "pay to play" model. It seems like the families of the two bench players donate their money for the "financial aid". So, our case, two full paid stay bench almost all the time, and three players with "financial aid" play full minutes. It is "pay to play", but generally speaking, players with "financial aid" play relatively longer time, since only good players can get the "financial aid" in the top team of the older age group. If many got injured, or absent whatever reason, I think coach just need to invite guest players from lower tier team or younger age team in the club. What happened was couple of players could not play or played less than 5 minutes at the game of all 18 players showed up. I prefer to 16 for 11v11, but my son's team has 18. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |